الرواية الشفوية و دورها في كتابة تاريخ الحركة الوطنية و الثورة

الملخص EN

oral witness is an important source of the history of events.

From there, the importance of oral testimony lies in the history of the Algerian national movement and the revolution, in particular in the period between 1954/1962.

The acceptance of oral history testimony as a source is not only an option, but rather a necessity imposed by the methodology of historical research, imposed by the logic of disability in Find the document to discover all the historical context and the details.

It is the urgent and necessary need to reach or approach the truth.

The size of the historical writings in the Algerian enclosures, in particular those linked to the period of masculinity, is still small compared to the colonial writings in general, and to the French in particular, and to the revolution in a precise way.

This may be due to two main factors: the first concerns the demands of the colonial school based on its hostilities, its denial of this nation, its sacrifices, its capacities and its desire for emancipation and challenge, so that it always spread its malicious poisons even after independence, denying its sacrifices to this nation.

As for the second factor, it lies in the incapacity and weakness of the Algerian National School to respond to these allegations, the lack of audacity, of collective memory, its fragility at times, and its vulnerability to penetration and penetration.

at other times