خصوصية المتابعة في الجرائم الاقتصادية و المالية

الملخص EN

Established in contemporary procedural systems, the Public Prosecutor has a detailed function and an excellent procedural position in penal follow-up and has full authority to direct and terminate such follow-up, although this is a general origin, this authority may be limited according to the nature of the facts under consideration, by the intervention of other organs and bodies, To be a partner of the Public Prosecutor's Office and a competitor in its authorities, especially when those events affect the financial and economic interests of the State, and are of a technical nature, with which the judiciary and the quasi-judicial system - in its general sense - cannot challenge its facts and appreciate the seriousness of the acts that affect and affect those interests; The purpose of this work is to assess the procedural status of the Public Prosecutor's Office in the follow-up to economic and financial crimes., To assess the seriousness of the actions that affect and affect those interests; to assess the procedural status of the Public Prosecutor's Office in the follow-up to economic and financial crimes and to assess its authority in the area of economic and financial crime, and the recent legislative trend toward the development of a national penal polity for the monitoring and suppression of economic and financial crimes.

الملخص FRE

Le ministère public remplit une fonction importante et possède un pouvoir procedural d'excellence, il jouit d'un plein pouvoir dans l'orientation de la poursuite jusqu’au jugement.

Ceci étant le principe, il arrive parfois que cette autorité soit restreinte ou limitée selon la nature des faits en question, par l'intervention d'autres organes qui s'associent à lui et parfois lui deviennent concurrents lorsque les faits portent atteinte aux intérêts financiers et économiquess de l'Etat et qu'ils sont de nature technique de sorte que l'appareil judiciaire ne puisse suffisamment estimer leur gravité.

Cette contribution se propose d'analyser le statut du ministère public dans la poursuite des infractions financières et économiques et d'évaluer son autorité à leur encontre notamment avec la création d'un pole judiciaire national en matière économique et financière.