واقع اعتماد حجم التأثير (الدلالة العملية)‎ و الدلالة الاحصائية في البحوث التربوية و النفسية ذات التصميمات التجريبية و شبه التجريبية

الملخص EN

The present study aimed to identify the reality of the adoption of the magnitude of the effect (practical significance) of experimental and semi-experimental research by revealing the percentage of research that has compared the magnitude of the impact with the level of significance, and comparing the level of impact volume of the experimental research with the level of impact size of the quasi-experimental studies, and differences in the use of volume The research sample was (42) experimental research (9) in the field of educational and psychological counseling and (13) research in the field of educational psychology, (20) research in teaching methods for the preparation of the Journal of Educational and Psychological Research for the years (2015 - 2015).

A questionnaire prepared by the researcher designed for the purpose of GM Statistical and mathematical means represented by percentage ratios and Kai squared of differences were also used.

The results showed that the use of the effect volume with the significance level of the T test (3% ), the analysis of variance (12% ), the nonparametric statistics of the Mann and Whitney test (0% ) and the Welcoxon test (0% ) are the proportion of studies that adopted the calculation.

The size of the impact of the results of statistical treatments (15% ), and the proportion of research that did not adopt the size of the effect (85% ), and this ratio is a high indicator of the reluctance to adopt the size of the impact when testing hypotheses, while the significance levels have been the research that adopted the level (0.05 In the hypothesis test (98% ), the other significance levels of the hypothesis test were (2% ).

Impact size (10% ) and the proportion of experimental studies (5% ), either by specialization rate of teaching methods (11% ) and counseling (1% ) and educational psychology (3% ), in the light of the results of the study recommended the need to include topics The impact and strength of statistical testing within the vocabulary of statistics for the stages of primary and higher studies, the need to hold scientific seminars and workshops to train researchers on ways to calculate the magnitude of impact, as the researcher suggests conducting studies to investigate the reality of the adoption of the impact of the impact in the discharge and practical messages for the disciplines of psychology, counseling, educational management and teaching The present study aimed to identify the reality of the adoption of the magnitude of the effect (practical significance) of experimental and semi-experimental research by revealing the percentage of research that has compared the magnitude of the impact with the level of significance, and comparing the level of impact volume of the experimental research with the level of impact size of the quasi-experimental studies, and differences in the use of volume The research sample was (42) experimental research (9) in the field of educational and psychological counseling and (13) research in the field of educational psychology, (20) research in teaching methods for the preparation of the Journal of Educational and Psychological Research for the years (2015 - 2015).

A questionnaire prepared by the researcher designed for the purpose of GM Statistical and mathematical means represented by percentage ratios and Kai squared of differences were also used.

The results showed that the use of the effect volume with the significance level of the T test (3% ), the analysis of variance (12% ), the nonparametric statistics of the Mann and Whitney test (0% ) and the Welcoxon test (0% ) are the proportion of studies that adopted the calculation.

The size of the impact of the results of statistical treatments (15% ), and the proportion of research that did not adopt the size of the effect (85% ), and this ratio is a high indicator of the reluctance to adopt the size of the impact when testing hypotheses, while the significance levels have been the research that adopted the level (0.05 In the hypothesis test (98% ), the other significance levels of the hypothesis test were (2% ).

Impact size (10% ) and the proportion of experimental studies (5% ), either by specialization rate of teaching methods (11% ) and counseling (1% ) and educational psychology (3% ), in the light of the results of the study recommended the need to include topics The impact and strength of statistical testing within the vocabulary of statistics for the stages of primary and higher studies, the need to hold scientific seminars and workshops to train researchers on ways to calculate the magnitude of impact, as the researcher suggests conducting studies to investigate the reality of the adoption of the impact of the impact in the discharge and practical messages for the disciplines of psychology, counseling, educational management and teaching methods.