ابستمولوجيا باشلار بين الفلسفة و العلم

الملخص EN

Bachelad's epistemology expresses a new philosophical view.

The new thinker with a scientific thought tries hardly toestablish it and to limit its aims.

Thus, we can say that it is no more than a trying to move to the transitional philosophicalview so that it corresponds with actual science.

This could not be achieved nor realized unless we manage to establish a different scientific philosophy that can standagainst the general philosophy of philosophers.

It is the only philosophy that can analyses the hard structure of themodern thought.

This epistemology deals with the difference that stands between philosophical transitional speech and the scientificmodern one.

The twenties 'sciences differ from those of the 18's and 19's.

Thus, philosophy ought to revise its definitionsand terms again so that it can understand what is new and modern in science.

Bachelar's works generally refer to all those efforts made to found and plant the seeds of new scientific thought.

However, the book entitled: "The No Philosophy" is considered the essence of philosophical practice in scientific subject's.

Or, letus say that it is the designing of a scientific philosophy, which is open to cope with its modern sciences.

What followed the book of "The No Philosophy" as the practical rationalism and the mental activity of modern physicsand the book of the concrete rationalism and other publications were all deep to explanation to what was mentionedin that book.

A look at the program of epistemology from the wide window of Bachelard results in some important roles Such as first, showing renewable epistemological values of science.

That one from science and not philosophy.

Second, the searchfor the effect of scientific knowledge on the structure of the mind and its development that can continually take manyforms and shapes.