قياس الميزة النسبية و القدرة التنافسية لمحصول العنب في العراق : محافظة صلاح الدين أنموذج تطبيقي للموسم الإنتاجي 2018 باستعمال مصفوفة تحليل السياسة الزراعية (PAM)‎

الملخص EN

The grape harvest of the fruit crops know at the local and global levels, resulting in good quantities in Iraq, but the lack of government supports inputs production, especially traders such as fertilizers, pesticides, fuel, and others.

As well as the lack of support for the outputs of marketing operations and the lack of canning plants, which have all prevented the sale of low-priced and non-profitable producers of grapes compared to the world.

Inclusion of grapes farms with in the agricultural plants set up by the people of agriculture.

The aim of this study was to know at the relative advantage and competitiveness of the production of the grapes in Iraq and the province of Salah-addin and analyze the impact of prices compared to social prices through the use of inputs and trade and non-trafficked.

The study comparative advantage and competitiveness of grapes through the measurement of some of the indicators derived from matrix of the analysis of agricultural policy was passed mainly on the data obtained from for a random sample of agricultural people containing.

Farms producing grapes in the entire governorate of salah-addin and reached this sample (221) farmers and the sample was divided into three categories according to the area.

The first category included the farms with in area of (1-2) acres reached (90) farmers.

The second category included farms (3-5) acres have reached (76) farmers.

The third category included farms (6) acres or more and amounted to (55) farmers, The percentage of (5.81% ) of the total number of grape growers in Salah-addin sample for the production season was (2018) and the results obtained from these sample were adopted as preliminary data.

The results of this study showed that the measures production and indicators of comparative advantage pointed the lack of government support for the output, even if it is very small and does not correspond to the size of support provided by the state to the likes of farms in the world.

The results also showed that there is a big difference between domestic and social selling prices if domestic selling prices are considered low and lost if the selling prices in the world are compared with the coefficient of the percentage of the subsidy (-32.71, -38.069, -36.003, -34.98 ).

For the categories and the total sample, indicating the lack of government supp0rt for this crop.

The study also found that the farmers of the first category (90) farmers who were identified according to the areas are the best category of production where the social return is high organizations they set a stadium to the squares they.