المتابعة الجزائية لجرائم الفساد بين الحماية و المسؤولية

الملخص EN

No one today can deny that the punishing of modern penal legislation has become dependent on its ability to keep pace with the developments in the commission of crimes, especially the crimes of financial corruption, so in the midst of the conflict between the right of the state to punish the perpetrator of criminal proceedings, Human rights and criminal legitimacy, it is no longer acceptable today to invoke the constitutional and legal principles to confront the seriousness of this crime, forcing the legislator to reorganize the rules of criminal follow-up at all stages of the public prosecution by strengthening the powers of the judicial police, And to authorize the use of exceptional powers and expansion of jurisdiction, as he did with the Public Prosecution.

In the same context, the latter referred to the distinguished rules of public prosecution, initiation and extinction, as exemplified by the stage of the trial, As well as to strengthen the procedural system of Law 06-01 with incentive measures to encourage the reporting of corruption crimes and to criminalize acts of obstruction of justice, in order to ensure the effectiveness of combating corruption.