ملامح الحوار الديني عند المتكلمين : (المعتزلة و الأشاعرة أنموذجا)‎

الملخص EN

This article aims to examine the sources of the Islamic theologian and to address the philosophers of the theological philosopher and verification philosophy in their philosophy, in terms of the possibility of adopting means of coexistence and human dialogue, and on the one hand the possibility of the culture of verbal dialogue in the recent Arab-Islamic reality.The question that can thus be asked: is it possible to speak of humanitarian religious dialogue in the context of the philosophy of the speakers and on the basis of clear dialogue or the subject of religion dialogue between speakers dictated by political events and the complexities related only to the Arab environment of the time? Regarding the question of philosophical dialogue was used by Socrates to correct certain concepts, since Plato used the methods of dialogue in his top-down and bottom-up approach .Plato spoke of the method of debate and dialogue to refute his sophisticated enemies.

As for the philosophical and religious dialogue of Muslims in medieval times, this method is known as philosophical debates and evolution in the science of dialogue, whether between the philosophers of Islam or the matter between speakers or even between philosophers and speakers.

In the context of the coexistence of verbal and philosophical ideas and trying to invest in the Arab-Islamic environment.

An example of this is the dialogue that took place between philosophers and speakers as a model.

As far as the speakers are concerned, there are schools and Islamic groups, in particular: the Mu'tazila and Ash 'aria groups have had verbal debates.

On the other hand, the Mu'tazila and Asharia groups were born as a result of the dialogue and discussions between the poles of the speech schools.

The most important discussions between them were either divine questions such as: God's vision or the question of human actions, and the issue of religious dialogue between the speakers extended to Muslim philosophers and was not part of the bilateral dialogue between a group, or another belonging to a religion namely Islam or between a philosopher and another philosopher, also belonged to the religion of Islam, but religious dialogue went beyond other religious laws such as that Christianity and Judaism, or even with some communities that do not believe in religion, monotheism.