مدى حجية الوسائل العلمية الحديثة في الإثبات من منظور التشريعات السودانية

الملخص EN

This study examined the end to which the modern scientific means of proof are reliable from the perspective of the Sudanese legislation, while the importance of the study is derived from the view that the adopted traditional proof means may not go with the modern scientific and technological development, in addition to the importance of proofing rights before the judge, since he is responsible for judging among people fairly, so as to pave the way for security and tranquility among members of society.

For all that there was a need for modern scientific means, that agree with this development in order to achieve justice.

The study problem is based on that, the issue of proof in the information crimes raises huge difficulties before judiciary, for its invisible by naked eye.

Of course the ence of evidence is a great obstacle before proofing the information crime.

In case of proof, to what extend are these modern scientific means useful in evidence? The study aimed to know the understanding of modern scientific means, their importance, adequacy and their argument in the proof.

The analytical descriptive and the inductive methodologies were adopted in the study.

The study findings included many results, here are the most important: The Sudanese legislator did not address the precise definition of criminal issues in the Information Crime Code for 2007, such as electronic data exchange, e-mail, telegraph and telex, in spite of its being an electronic tools that need civil and criminal protection.

The study came out with several recommendations, here are the most important: The amendment of Sudanese Information Crime Code for 2007, to include a precise definition for criminal issues and the means of electronic proof and give them the full argument and equality as other means of proof.