اختلافات المعتزلة في توحيد الأسماء و الصفات

الملخص EN

The research aimed to highlight the difference of Mutazili differences in the standardizing names and attributes, and to clarify the invalidity of the Mutazilicreed in the standardizing names and attributes in the light of the Qur'an, Sunnah and according to the predecessormethod.

The research relied on the deductive inductive approach.

The research includes an introduction, a preface, and two chapter.

The first chapterabout the difference of Mutaziliin names, and the second chapter about the difference of Mutaziliin attributes.

The research indicated a set of results, the most important are: Mutazilistatements are different about the names of Allah: Baghdadis believed that the names of Allah Almighty are eternal, and the mindcould not interfere with them.

As for the Basrans: they are not dependent on their hearing, but it is permissible to prove them through language, reason and measurement, if their meaning is correct in the language, and did not indicate an ugly meaning in their vision and mind.

And opposes them in the general approach in the names of Allah; some of them claimed that the names of Allah Almighty are different, and others claimed that these names are synonymous, with their agreement that it is pure and has no meanings.

Their statements are different to proving some attibutes in general, as the Abu Al-Hussein Al-Basri Al-Mutazili doctrine believed inproven some attributes, such as science, ability and life, and the Basransdoctrine believed in terms of apparent recognition, where they are opposed by Mutazilidoctrine of Baghdad, who are more exaggerated in hyperbole and deny, so they denied these attributes and did not prove them.