الفروق الدلالية بين "كل" و "جميع" في اللغة العربية و القرآن الكريم : دراسة لغوية قرآنية

الملخص EN

Research theme: Highlighting the subtle differences in meaning between the lexical items of kull (lit.

every) and jamīc (lit.

all) taking into account the origin of their semantic referentiality and their signification of totality in Arabic at large, as well as the Qur’anic discourse, in particular.

Research aims: 1- Shedding light on the beauty of the Quran and its elated style, which constitutes a part of its immutability.

2- Advancing the linguistic and insightful capabilities of those engaged in exegesis.

Research problem: What is the secret behind the Qur’anic usage of kull in a certain place and jamīc in another? Why did they occur alongside each other in certain instances? Research results: 1- The word kull encompasses all individual elements in their totality whatever state they are in.

Conversely, jamīc signifies collectiveness only when togetherness is in session with regards time, place or state.

2- The word kull does not take the definite article al because it is itself definite- it modifies definite and indefinite nouns.

The word jamīc, on the other hand, does not modify indefinite nouns under no circumstance.