موقف ابن السراج (ت 316ه)‎ من القراءات القرآنية في كتابه الأصول في النحو

الملخص EN

1- We note that Ibn al-Sarraj, like other fanatical hard-liners, adheres to the philosophical norm, he agrees with the readings that agree with the rules and measures and refuses to disagree with them, Describes reading ugly or wrongor anomalies and find despite his protest to the seven readings, However, it has been after repeated reading in the abnormal reading if the rule agreed and measurement towards what we have mentioned in the reading of the verse: ((Or came you surrounded their breasts)).

) ) 6432- Ibn al-Sarraj abnormal reading stronger status than non-abnormal has been preceded by Siboih in that he says: ((people have read)) ((thief and the thief)) and ((adulterer and adulterer)), which is from the Arabic saying ((read It is lighter on the tongue, because the letter Y applied Kalta Vtitma skipper in the hearing)) did not mention the reading (Abu Omar): ((These two witches)) because it is contrary to the drawing of the Koran is a reading seven.3- Through my knowledge of the views of scientists I found that many scientists go to the lack of frequency of readings The following is the opinion of some scientists:  Zarkashi (d.

749 AH) says: ((The investigation is frequent for the seven imams and the frequency of the Prophet(peace be upon him and his family) it is considered)).

What seems to me that these readings come from dialects and differences in the readings is a difference in dialects and did not know that no one of the Muslims disbelieved anyone for any of this.

The truth is that the Qur'an and the readings are different and this is what al-Zarkashi (d.

794 AH) and (Sayyid al-Khoei in his book Investigations in the Sciences of the Qur'an).

On what I mentioned to you of the strength, but the general nence only reading lifting, but was the face in the matter and forbidding the monument, (because the limit of speech is the duty) and read the monument reading Isa bin Omar, and Yahya bin Omar and Omar bin Abi commander and Abu Jaafar and likeness)).

) )موقف ابن الس ا رج)ت 613 ه( من الق ا رءات القرآنية في كتابه الأصول في النحو.

.

.

.

.

.

) 643 Ibn al-Sarraj was not considered reading an argument except what was in accordance with the rules of the language and the priest and the established rules.

The successor described as ugliness or error or anomaly.

 Ibn al-Sarraj did not distinguish between reading the Koran and reading the readers, but looked at them on the line, whether the reading of the Koran is to read Hafs from Asim.

 Reading is famous for them if read by only two readers and this is due to its fame and acquaintance scientists of the two countries.

 We find Ibn al-Sarraj is committed to drawing the Koran in the readings dealt with is not including a reading contrary to the drawing, and this when directing readings in the verse: (We gave the straight path).

التمهيد