أسماء الأيام في كتاب المخصص : دراسة دلالية معجمية

الملخص EN

Keep an eye out for frequent visions of chronological structure between the names of the days in the books; Where borrowing settles, with reference to the vast digression of the Babylonian myth as its lexicon in history; Because it is the first to call the days.

The debate goes on between nations and religions in the framework of the languages of the regions.

Until it reaches its sum among the Aramaic, Hebrew, and Arabic languages; In addition to the Pharaonic, and Greek, up to the Day of the People to find their suitability with the English language, as was recognized by the late Abbas Akkad in his book (The Impact of the Arabs in European Civilization).

This can be described as the interlocking struggle between the types of ruling authority for each time.

Perhaps it is better for those who wrote this recently, Khaled Darwish - in an article in the civilized dialogue entitled Friday in the Axis of Secularism, Political Religion and Religious Thought Criticism in Issue No.

7555 on 4/2/2018.

And his intention to do so historically is not purely linguistically.

In this way, I will try to explore the linguistic efforts of Ibn Sayyidah - an example of his mentioning the names of days in pre-Islamic and Islamic times - within the language of linguistic analysis, and the interpretation of that semantic development in what he installed in his allocate in my endeavor to show the components of the parallel between the pre-Islamic and Islamic circles, with the presentation of harmony with the harmonization of the lexicon of harmony To show that the status of the nomenclature, and its different adaptation between the ages in one language, was not separate from the meaning and the dictionary.

And away from the storytelling that preceded him.

In line with the semantic fields in the allocation, the research took place in singling out each day of itself with its data: (linguistic, morphological, and lexical) and the significance between them.

This adventure may hit or miss.

It suffices that it is pure linguistic research in a difficult linguistic body.