دراسة سريرية لجراحة القرين السفلي التصغيرية التنظيرية مقارنة بالخزع الجزئي التقليدي

الملخص EN

Aims and objectives: This in vivo study evaluated an inferior turbinate trimming using endoscopic surgery and compared this method with conventional partial turbinectomy.

Material sand methods: 16 patients were involved in this study.

The patients were divided equally into two experimental groups.

Endoscopic trimming was conducted within the first group, whilst conventional partial turbinectomy was used in the second group.

Follow up assessment for post-operative bleeding, headache, infection, nose dryness and obstruction was fulfilled.

t-student statistical analysis was used to evaluate the significant factors (P=0.05).

Results: Post-operative nasal obstruction within endoscopic group was significantly less than that recorded within the conventional surgery group (P<0.05).

The post-operative bleeding percentage recorded within conventional operator was significantly higher 50%, than those for endoscopic surgery 12.5% (P<0.05).

One atrophic rhinitis case was observed when conventional approach was used.

Conclusion: Within the limits of this study, endoscopic trimming surgery is a promising option to treat inferior turbinate hyperplasia as its utilizing enhanced the selectivity removal of diseased tissues.