ثنائية المرسل و المتلقي : مقاربة في ضوء مرجعيات نظرية التلقي

الملخص EN

In below the most important findings of the research, has opted not to detail because the reader will find is that you mentioned during the search.

1- I grew up receiving theory within the context of a compound, they echo the many developments ...

Intellectual, political, social and monetary ...

and colorful references Depth of the foot in the modern era of simulation and identify cleansing and transformation when Aristotle ....

To Russian Formalism and structural Prague ...

And the sociology of literature.

This involves: A - that this theory does not claim it's an absolute, and it came in force governing which does not resume.

B - multiple readings of this theory.

C - multiple receive and differs from environment to environment, it is itself (text) met because it receives from before different audiences with different cultures.

D- She lives in the process of historical process, like any theory and thus some of its elements can be modified or canceled each, or added to it, they are in the state of development and permanent change.

E -reverse (Iyawas) on significant aspects of the early idea, or at least brushed aside.

He thought (Iyawas) always turns on, and it seems that what cares about today is not only his relationship and flimsy Bbdayate in 1970.

F - there is opposition to the term (implicit Reader) when Aiserbalacharh to the results arising from the foggy this term.

2- and an object differing substantially between astronauts theory Receive Iyawas, WISER Although they may Their interest re-formation of literary theory by divert attention from the author and the text, and focus on the relationship text / reader, the Mnahjhma own in dealing with this shift differed sharply.

3- whistled new monetary trends and receive special theory towards the abolition of the fact that the author created after using for this language did not Eptdaha, but he inherited as other inherited these trends did not notice that this is true on the receiver, any receiver that also did not invent the language used.

4- Bart went to the dimensions of the author, but to kill him in (hiss language), but he changed his mind in the (thrill text) as desired, in any form, and I need his image.

5- The author Foucault sees the broad cultural space, filled this concept for a long time, and warned that his death will leave a vacuum that must be filled by another concept, but went further, saying: we Nkhada ourselves, sustaining the announcement of the death of the author only , while he has it powers and forbidding.

6- But Derrida, he put the author on the brink of death, and did not slay him, and Aovernm, making it a sign Trekked never, neither Bart nor Foucault traced or eliminate them.

7- in the transmitter away from the creativity, which features (sender, text, receiver), threatening creative process Cracked the trusses and collapse.

8- that the sender and receiver are not b (enemies Brothers) but are (Brotherhood Ahumaiman) Almtwaslan, because the sender partition between the receiver in the text, they continue on, just do not touch.

Because the contact is enough to happen, sent from one party, and communicate shared by the two parties, in giving and taking, and send and receive, so the this Batha sender and the future, and the future will be, receiver and transmitter.

As the: A - author writes a literary text evokes the reader, leaving him the speech.

B - and the writer shows the reader on the road, and guided and merely Directed .

Vahawa_khas and hosted by the monuments in the road differentiates them void, on the receiver to fill and beyond.

C - that all the process of writing a must-have of the reading process, and the process of writing process involves reading, logically necessary, the two processes Require two distinct factors: the writer and the reader.

D - that the literary work will be able to discover the truth its own quality, but the existence of the reader, who is participating in an active spiritual adventure action and match with him, and the strength of this matching in mutual Alanmh for the author and the reader.