مصطلح التخريج عند المالكية

الملخص EN

This research aims to reach the most commonly used idiomatic truth of the term: “takhrij” among Maliki jurists, as they have multiple versions ofthis term.

But those who follow this find a difference in the desires from each release from one use to another.

The books of Usul al-Fiqh often refer to it as reasoning and directing opinions transmitted from the scholars and stating their deficiencies in it.

, ibn el hadjib; presented it against some conventions such as: the agreement, the well-known, the more correct, the stipulated, the well-known, the madhhab While the general scholars of the doctrine wanted two meanings: takhrij of the branches from the principles, and takhrij of the branches from the branches, and this last meaning is the one employed by the masters of takhrij, such as: Ibn al-Qasim and Ibn Rushd al-Jidd and their offspring.

As his matter unfolded among them, they expressed it in a variety of terms towards: “So this is also with me.

” “It is like measuring issues for me.

” “Conveying an issue to an issue by analogy.

” And they followed three paths in it: the course of takhrij based on two different narratives, the course of takhrij on one issue stipulated, the course of takhrij Contrary to the stipulated ruling.