الحديث الشاذ : دراسة تأصيلية تطبيقية

الملخص EN

God almighty prepared the Prophet's Sunnah as imams of modernists, who preserved, scrutinized and scrutinized and not content themselves with accepting the narrations merely by trusting their novels until they followed them in each narration separately, knowing how agreed or contrary to the preservation of the believers, and explaining the reason for this difference between trusts and rooting out the quality of these differences, their judgment and the means of detection, and these differences of abnormal modernity.

He is one of the most close types of hadith, and therefore the definitions of imams for the gay hadith, which was settled by the hadith people, are what Imam Shafi'i knew, and followed by Al-Hafiz Ibn Hajar, and it is necessary to restrict the uniqueness and violation of the former.

The ambiguity of the concept of homosexuality is due to three things: the first is the rare violation of trust and the second: the apparent consideration of the words of the ruling imams, and the cell of the uniqueness of trust at all, and the uniqueness of the narrator at all to enter the individuals of the saha under the third: that the advanced imams did not differentiate at all between the gay and the denier in one sense, In this research, I wanted to contribute something easy to bring the truth, images, types, judgment, and relationship to other types of modern sciences closer to the concept of abnormal hadith, because safety is one of the conditions of the right talk.

The purpose and purpose of requiring that homosexuality be denied in a proper way is to emphasize that trust has controlled every particular conversation.