كان في النحو القرآني من وجهة نظر الدكتور خليل بنيان الحسون

الملخص EN

There is no doubt that the incomplete past reaction represented by (Was) in the Noble Qur’an has given it grammatical connotations not observed in studies of (familiar grammar), represented by measurements received by the Basrians, and others who imitate their measurement and walked in its light, ignoring their il- luminations We framed it in our study with the concept of (Qur’anic grammar), with a precise concept, meaning: “The rules that are found in the Qur’an and are not included in the measurement of the majority of grammarians.” Rather, the bearing of that is loaded (abnormal, rare, wild, weak, etc.) This, and what I seek to support in these papers revolves around a circle whose title is: (warding off any suspicion about the author and maker of the language from describing his linguistic methods in the sacred expression as abnormal and weak, and this is not appropriate for the divine self, which is audacity and transgression against it).

As a matter of enriching the Arabic language, we worked, as well as others, to move the wheel of phonemic grammar and push it head-to-head with the alleged measurements of the owners of the (old lesson).

Definitely it’s asimplified glim came in the light of a grammatical Quranic study in precise concept entitled (Was) in the Quranic grammar from the point of view of Dr.

Khalil Bunyan Al-Hassoun.