قول الصحابي عند الأصوليين و أثره في الفروع الفقهية

الملخص EN

The research dealt with the quality of the companion's statement among the evidence in terms of pieces and suspicions, and that it is from the presumptive evidence that is different.

The research dealt with the meaning of the intended companion, their number, and the conditions of companionship, then the difference between the established justice for them and the infallibility that is only for the prophets.

The research concerned the intended saying of the companion and that what is meant by it is the statement issued by ijtihad, or its fatwa, and it is not intended what was reported by the Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, because what he transmits from the Messenger is a duty to be taken unanimously after the conditions of the novel are fulfilled.

The research dealt with editing the subject of the dispute between scholars on this issue, and it became clear that the companion's saying is not an excuse in meeting another companion, and that his saying is an argument with no realization of reason and ijtihad, because it is the subject of transmission from the owner of the revelation.

The research dealt with the inconsistency between the sayings of the companions of each other, then the inconsistency between the statement of the companion and the measurement, and how to remove it.

The research dealt with the impact of scholarly disagreement on the authenticity of the companion's statement on acts of worship and transactions, and the research dealt with some of the juristic branches of both.

The research concluded with conclusion and the most important results as mentioned.