فلسفة المسوغات النحوية في الميزان : مسوغات الابتداء بالنكرة أنموذجا

الملخص EN

The Philosophy of grammatical standardization tools, or changing the structure of an otherwise ungrammatical sentence to make it grammatical through specific alterations reveals grammarians' methods in dealing with irregular structures.

It is based on making language use easier and removing what would render certain common structures ungrammatical, a feature which emphasizes the characteristics of Arabic grammatical thought in different eras.

The key questions this study poses are: Is deviating from a certain grammatical rule only a matter of form-breaching which can be remedied with the application of these tools? What is the relationship between an original grammatical rule and the conditions for applying the tools which justify breaking it? Does the application of such tools with irregular structures fulfill the grammatical and contextual functions which the original rule fulfills? What is the relationship between the use of these tools and grammatical thought? Due to the numerous ways in which grammarians have dealt with the issue, the answers to these questions are limited in this study to the case of starting with the nakirah (indefinite article) in Arabic sentences.

It applies an analytical, based on sub secondary characteristics.

These applications, the study proposes, follow two modes: the nakirah and the nakirah's khabar (predicate).

The study also argues that the rule of specification is key to the case of the nakirah as it is manifested through the relationship between the two corners of such structures and that each tool indicates two dimensions: the general contextual and the specifically grammatical