أسئلة الأنانة : استيهام الذات في تأويلية بول ريكور

الملخص EN

We have dealt with Paul Ricoeur three types of ego, which are the fossil ego, the ego, and the infallible ego.

In the first: we dealt with his stance on the Freudian ana and the arrows of his criticism directed at him because he was past.

Because he is not aware of the multiplicity of signs, signs and future signs, because he has always been in the past, leaving the childish past's desire to control the analysis.

We discussed with Paul Ricoeur in his critique of Husserl Alana's body intention, which is an attempt to dismantle and raise the Husserli consciousness to reality.

The self-lived experience is separate from its subject and transcendent by its pure awareness of the subject and cannot be reduced to a body-object because that negates the other selves.

Anna's awareness is part of the reality experience and is partial and must interact with other groups in the exchange of discourse.

As for the irrational Alana, it is an interpretative attempt by Ricoeur to criticize the idea of sin and the symbolism of evil in religions, to dive into its historical dimensions and to search the roots of its ideas and the circumstances of its circumstances to verify the meaning of its existence as a discourse full of contradictions and imperatives that do not express the meaning of the human self.

Sin seems like a moral concept and its aim is to maintain the relationship between the self and the other.