الجدارة الإدارية لدى مديري المدارس الابتدائية في محافظة بغداد من وجهة نظرهم

الملخص EN

The research problem lies in the fact that the issue of modernizing educational institutions and their school management and developing them has become one of the most important issues in modernizing management, and despite the administrative efforts made to develop and reform the administrative apparatus in institutions in human resource management in general, the practical reality indicates that there are some gaps and administrative obstacles in Educational institutions, which are sometimes clouded by ambiguity and jurisprudence, because poor application of administrative meritocracy standards or non-application will lead to the creation of weak departments that are unable to keep pace with developments, improve the quality of services and make rational decisions, Consequently, the public interest requires the necessity of applying merit management standards on the ground by placing the right person in the right place.

The importance of research is that it is based on an important topic that affects the ability of public institutions and the achievement of their goals.

.

he aim of the research is to identify the extent of the practice of administrative meritocracy by elementary school principals from their point of view and to find differences in merit management according to the gender variable (males and females) and experience from (10 and from 10 to 15 and above.

The research was determined from the current research community of principals who work in primary schools in the General Directorates of Education in the two sides (Rusafa 1, 2, 1) and (Al-Karkh 3, 2, 1), in the governorate of Baghdad for the academic year (2020/2021), as Their total number reached (2, 457) managers.

Where the researcher defined a set of terms related to the research, presented a number of topics in the theoretical side that are related to the topic, and touched upon a group of studies related to the topic, A set of procedures were followed in terms of describing the research community and its sample.

A sample consisting of (400) individuals was obtained at a rate of (16.3% ) to the research community.

From the results, then display and interpret them.

Then I developed a set of conclusions, recommendations and proposals for the research.