المسائل الفقهية المتعلقة بالتسمية عند الذبح : دراسة فقهية مقارنة

الملخص EN

Praise be to God, and prayers and peace be upon the Messenger of God and his family and companions.

The issue of naming the carcass is one of the very important issues, because it is permissible for the carcass and without it, it is not eaten according to a saying, rather it may be dead.

Therefore, I sought in this research to gather as many issues as possible related to the naming of the sacrifice.

After the introduction, the research came on a preamble in which the meaning of naming and basmalah and the difference between them, as well as the meaning of slaughter and sacrifice and the difference between them.

After that, there are two demands: the first: the issues related to naming, and there were four issues: The first: the ruling on naming, and it was based on three sayings.

The first: it is a condition that falls into oblivion.

The second: a condition that does not fall into oblivion, and the third: a year.

The second: Forms of naming: There were agreed upon formulas, such as in the name of God and God is great or only in the name of God.

There are different formulas in it, such as glorification and praise, or in the name of God, and may God's prayers and peace be upon the Messenger of God.

The third: the time of naming it: according to two opinions.

The first: at the time of slaughtering directly, if the interval between naming and slaughtering is long, then he must repeat the naming, and if it is small, there is nothing wrong with it.

The second saying: There is no limitation of the time.

If he said it at the time of slaughter or after it, or he left the name, then the sacrifice is permissible.

Fourth: The ruling on naming in a language other than Arabic for one who is fluent in Arabic and from a non-Arabic speaker.

The second: If the slaughterer is able to speak Arabic, it is not acceptable for anything else.

The second requirement: Issues related to the slaughterer and in it there are three issues: First: A ruling if the slaughtered person has special needs and it has three branches: Section One: If the slaughterer's disability is sensory like a blind person, there is no doubt that his sacrifice is resolved based on the ruling on naming.

And if he was mute, then there was consensus that his sacrifice should be dissolved, and thus his name was correct by reference.

The second branch: If the disability of the slaughterer is mental (the insane and the lunatic): If the insanity is applied, then the first two sayings: His name is incorrect and therefore his sacrifice is not permissible.

The second: the dissolution of his sacrifice for the correctness of his will and the intention of his action.

And if insanity is not applied like a lunatic, then there are two opinions.

The second is not to solve his sacrifice because there is no intention of it.

The third branch: If the victim's disability is motor (the paralyzed): This is if his paralysis is complete, then he is unable to, and whoever is semi-paralyzed is like the normal in its provisions.

The second: a ruling if the slaughterer was a non-Muslim and has two branches: The first branch: if the slaughterer was a clerical person.

They were unanimously agreed that his sacrifice should be permissible if God named it or did not know the name of it or did not name it.

And they differed if the name of Christ is named on it according to the first two sayings: His sacrifice is not permissible.

The second: his sacrifice shall be dissolved.

The second subsection: If the slaughterer is not from the Book.

Kalmjusi and pagan and apostate, these unanimously do not solve their sacrifices.

The third: a ruling if the name is not the slaughterer, and it has two branches: The first branch: if the named person is human.

According to the first two sayings: the naming is not acceptable, and thus the sacrifice is not permissible.

The second: The name is acceptable because it is a Sunnah, whether someone else said it or left it.

The second subsection: If the name is a machine, such as the recorder.

It is like the previous issue of two opinions based on the ruling on naming.

Praise be to God, by whose grace good deeds are accomplished