توجيه المعنى للعدول عن الضمير للاسم الظاهر في أمالي ابن الحاجب (ت 646هـ)‎

الملخص EN

Summary Arab scholars have developed rules through which they seized the assets of the statement, weighed on them the style of speech, and decided that departing from these rules should not be anything but a calling for this exit.

And one of the rules they have determined is that if the name is mentioned first, it should not be repeated, but it should be mentioned in a context.

However, they have called for the re-manifestation of the meaning of the name.

Manifestation and insinuation is a matter of names, and the origin of nouns should be visible, and if the name is mentioned secondly, it should be mentioned in a substance; You say: The weather was nice، it was not hot or cold.

So he said, "It is because the language is not a language, to bring it back, " and says: "The atmosphere.

.

.

this is the origin of speech.

However, this origin may come in the context of speech، which calls for getting out of it, the name is ostensibly returned, and his right to be included, and the example in the words of Uday bin Zaid said: I do not see death before death He repeated (death) at home three times; This meansthat the departure from this origin must be for the benefit of meaning, achieved by mentioning the name again، and where there is no benefit, the repetition of the name, which is damaged in the assets of speech.

The research traces the effect of meaning in directing the defiance of the name in the book of Amali to the son of the eyebrow.