القليوبي و حاشيته على شرح المقدمة الأزهرية

الملخص EN

In this research, we discussed the definition of the author of the commentary, the owner of the footnote and the introduction of the Azharite.

Al-Qaliubi did not only break the words and open the sentences, but he also mentioned the words of the violators and the doctrines of those who violated them, and they were fair in judging their statements in terms of strength, weakness, In order to verify everything that was passed by the mark of Khalid al-Azhari, and therefore he agreed in matters and disagreed in the other weak the saying or whether it is the first disagreement or that the non-approved and after him the most correct in the grammar.

And that the observation on the annotations, which is necessary to show the insanity of the words and their meanings and the statement made by the fool or overlooked by him and confirm all that hit him so that the reader is very sure of the authenticity of what is read and not be contrary or abnormal.

The paper is divided into three sections.

The first subject: MethodThe second topic: its resourcesThe third topic: his citations and his In this research, we discussed the definition of the author of the commentary, the owner of the footnote and the introduction of the Azharite.

Al-Qaliubi did not only break the words and open the sentences, but he also mentioned the words of the violators and the doctrines of those who violated them, and they were fair in judging their statements in terms of strength, weakness, In order to verify everything that was passed by the mark of Khalid al-Azhari, and therefore he agreed in matters and disagreed in the other weak the saying or whether it is the first disagreement or that the non-approved and after him the most correct in the grammar.

And that the observation on the annotations, which is necessary to show the insanity of the words and their meanings and the statement made by the fool or overlooked by him and confirm all that hit him so that the reader is very sure of the authenticity of what is read and not be contrary or abnormal.

The paper is divided into three sections.

The first subject: MethodThe second topic: its resourcesThe third topic: his citations and his predictions