دراسة تطبيقية في معجمات التصحيح اللغوي الحديثة في ضوء علم اللغة الحديث

الملخص EN

Language correction is explained as a spontaneous state which is a result from the speaker and listener's understanding of his own language.

Human beings are born endowed with a general abstract language system- competence and (while listening to language production) performance.

In certain language environments, humans will be able to store its rules.

They are not able to speak unless he is able to correct the erroneous sentences and complete the incomplete ones.

There is a difference between accurate and correct .The former means to say something is right while the latter is to say whether something is right or wrong.

The word «correct» is the technical term adopted in the present study .This study is a practical investigation to six modern lexicons for language correction .

They are: 1- Ma’jm Ala’khta’a Al-Shaa’a’ah A’ou kul Wla Tekul, written by Kawkab Diab .

It is referred to as Ma’jm Kawkab.

2.

Ma'jm Ala’khta'a Al-Shaa’a’ah , Wali'jazatAllghuiah, written by Judah Ma- bruk Muhammad.This is referred to as Mabruk .

3.

Ma’jm Ala’khta’a Al-Shaa’a’ah , taswyban Wshrhan Wtrjmah, written by Khidr Moussa Muhammed Hammoud.This is referred to as Moussa.

4.Ma’jm Alsawab Walkhata’ fi Allughaha Ala’rabih , by Tawfiq Hassan Alawi- ah.lt is referred to as Alawiah.

5.

Ma’jm Alswab Allughoui- Delil Almuthakaf Ala’rabi , written by Ahmed Mukhtar Omr.lt is referred to as Ma’jm Mukhtar.

6.

Ma’jm Alakhta Alnhwyia Wllughouia Walsrfyia Alshaiah, written by khidr Abd Al-Rahim (Abu Al-Aynayn) The priority is given to Judah Mabruk Muhammad’s lexicon on khider Moussa Muhammed Hammoud’s (although they are issued in the same year, 2005, depending on the sequence of the first letter of their names in alphabetical order of Arabic).

This study addresses common issues on the phonological level in particular, taking into account the described issues present in several of the six lexicons that were chosen.

In order to demonstrate the greatest possible language and critical feature shared by these lexicons at this level, we discuss it critically and analytically.

It is worth mentioning that there is a difficulty in finding the critical dimensions governing some issues of the research because authors tackle them from different angles.

Initially, the issues are explained with reference to the names of the lexicographers who neglect dealing with the topics, keeping track of what authors specifically say about making reference to lexicons , and books of syntax and morphology.

Furthermore, it discusses disputes about what was proposed as changes and modifications, where it is found necessary by commenting, or by giving an idea, a preference or a conclusion.