المنهج التأويلي : قراءة في تأصيل المنهج و تقنيات المعالجة

الملخص EN

The research dealt with the hermeneutic approach related to philosophy and intertwined with most critical approaches.

It is the closest approach to interpreting the text and approaching the world of the creator who produced it, but we urgently need to develop it in order to come up with convergent results about them in the texts due to the difference in interpretation, so we had to differentiate between interpretation and interpretation.

Interpretation has been linked to the term “Ferminotica” and we found that the ancient criticism focused on the creator or speaker and limited its significance to what he wanted, taking the text as a support to strengthen his position, especially in religious texts, but the change that prevailed in the study of artistic literary texts and the role that the reader played in receiving and producing the artistic text So that we can say that the reader is the one who produces the text, and the research deals with the mechanisms of the interpretive method that are based on the text.

It does not recognize the limits of time and place, nor the difference between race, religion or intellectual trend, but rather penetrates all of them to reach the farthest possible point in time and place, so this product does not explain the text Rather, he interprets it through the first, second and third reading, in which the objective meaning that has been orbed in the previous two readings is clarified, so the aesthetic understanding becomes synonymous with the objective understanding, so the question becomes: What do I want to say through the text instead of what the text says? Therefore, criticism based on interpretation is It has a dual nature that intensifies a new meaning of the text, and with time we need another interpretation, so it must be subject to constants in order to be a burdened field, in addition to the fact that the one who practices this interpretation is the grammatical reader.