مراعاة أحوال الدليل وأثرها في الإبقاء والإلغاء

الملخص EN

This research draws the correct path for the inferences of the mujtahid and the mufti, who deals with incidents and accidents, and lays the first building blocks for them, in order to go to the most correct and fairest sayings in terms of judgment and purpose.

it is a mere suspicion that he does not care about, so it was the duty of every mujtahid, judge and mufti to take the inference from his family who know the words of the Arabs and the faculties of Sharia and its purposes, and after consideration I find that the lack of reflection and depth in the conditions of the evidence and not taking them into account in many fatwas, lose them sobriety, and expect them in a cage.

the accusation and refutation, rather the abnormal fatwas, do not have a tangible effect in the place of the dispute, but rather turn into a mere suspicion that quickly ends and fades, and a path to possibility and defect, and from there many fatwas spread when they were hasty and absent the observance, so neglecting it means weak inference, and not standing on the meaning that we worship god is with him, and from there, the evidence is in dire need of a diligent, contemplative, contemplative, observing his conditions and settling what is going on around him.

contemporary, overlooking some of the evidence, was an original study that was not traditional; to crystallize the thought of the aspired diligent; the research will come with an introduction, four sections, and a conclusion.