تجليات نظرية التلقي في الخطاب النقدي العربي المعاصر: دراسة نقدية ومقارنة

الملخص EN

Under the increasing demands to renew necessarily the critical discourse, sing critical reading which is derived from western reception theories, a fundamental question remains that hardly finds an attempt to answer it, which is: why do these claimers content themselves with repeating theoretical statements, and complaining about the Arabic critical discourse, and its close connection to the ancient heritage, without them having serious applied studies, nor enough attempts to read poetic texts or others in light of the basics of western reading criticism, instead of demanding exaggeratedly un imitation to western reception theories.

through many and varied readings, the researcher concluded that the most of what these critics presented in the field of using the rules of reading criticism is the use of ambiguous phrases, and imported terms, by reading a very small number of poems to few poets; those who were known for their strangeness, and rebellion against the laws of sharia, custom, and language.

the researcher have decided to highlights a study that some researchers testified to its author that he successfully employed the techniques of reading criticism on al-Ma’arri’s poetry, and to compare him with one of the critics who were not attracted by the invitations of the readers, but he offers interesting readings and convincing interpretations, with reservations on some of them sometimes, and not accepting some of it other times.

between this and that, the researcher tries to contribute with additions and comments as much as possible: rejection or support, comment or reservation, based on the fact that the critic has the right to participate in the production of the poetic poem, and to read it, without exaggeration or negligence.