قضية المفاضلة بين المنظوم و المنثور في النقد العربي القديم

الملخص EN

It is well known that the idea of the trade-off between poetry and prose has attracted the attention of critics, writers and poets, so differing opinions, and the difference of evidence, among those who believe that poetry is the divan of the Arwho do not have a more correct knowledge of it, is the introduction of prose, while many, especially from the book, believe that prose, which is the origin of speech, cannot compete with poetry in preference, and the importance of research comes in that it highlights the whole of the words in this matter in the old days, and monitors their most important perceptions of what one of them prefers.

On the other hand, perhaps the problem raised in this regard is the difference of the views of the old people of the issue of the difference between poetry and prose for the diversity of the angles of vision, and the nature of their cognitive background, as well as addressing the controversy about the precedence between poetry and prose, as well as proving the existence of artistic prose in ignorance, as for the most important findings, including: the difference of contemporary scholars in saying the primacy of poetry over prose or vice versa, although this disagreement does not present and does not delay the importance of each of them, including the opinion that the appearance of the opinion that does not appear Artistic prose in jahiliya is far from the facts, evidences and evidence to prove its contrary, including the diversity of evidence among those who say the preference of poetry over prose, as well as those who say the preference of prose over poetry in the Arab monetary heritage, which raises more than one question about the usefulness of this dispute, although to say that they each have something to distinguish from their owner, and that they have the moral, social and intellectual importance that came in response to the Arab bet at that time