الغرامة التهديدية كأسلوب لحث الإدارة على تنفيذ الأحكام القضائية الإدارية في الأردن

العناوين الأخرى

Threat fine as a method to induce the administration to execute administrative judgements against it in Jordan

مقدم أطروحة جامعية

الطراونة، هلا ياسين زعل

مشرف أطروحة جامعية

العضايلة، سالم حمود أحمد

الجامعة

جامعة مؤتة

الكلية

كلية الحقوق

القسم الأكاديمي

قسم القانون العام

دولة الجامعة

الأردن

الدرجة العلمية

ماجستير

تاريخ الدرجة العلمية

2021

الملخص الإنجليزي

This letter dealt with the subject of the study, namely the most important method of threatening fine, which differs from other methods similar to it by legal force.

This letter, by looking at the outset in detail, and then mentioning its characteristics, then referring to what distinguishes it from other similar methods.

This study also shows the legal truth of the threatening fine by mentioning the truth of The scope of its application, the conditions relating thereto, and the importance of its existence in States, in particular Jordan, are addressed by mentioning their value assessment.

The objective of the study is to indicate the extent to which the Jordanian legal system is capable of applying it as a way to compel the administration to execute all administrative judicial decisions handed down against it.

It must have been proven that it is a modern judicial method that responds to the intransigent administration and compel it to execute it.

It is a guarantee of the implementation The administrative judge in how to judge it and to address the legal basis against intransigent administration in order to use the so-called forced execution against the administration at the end, we reached the possibility of applying it in Jordan by describing that the Jordanian legal system did not adopt the threatening fine as a way of urging the public administration to execute the administrative judgements against it, nor did How it is liquidated and the fate of the responsible official who causes it to the Department was mentioned.

The study has produced a series of findings, most notably the need for Jordan for urgent administrative justice and the authority to issue orders to the administration to take the necessary measures to protect the fundamental freedoms of individuals.

This is only possible through legislative intervention, drawing on the experience of States in this area.

This is aimed at providing protection of fundamental freedoms in cases where there is no prospect of delay until the resolution In confronting the intransigent administration, and to have effective means to break its intransigence in its failure to execute, the most important of which is a threatening fine, with a view to achieving justice that ensures the execution of the sentences handed down against it, and the amount of the threatening fine in the request for the separation clause in the dispute, in order to force the.

التخصصات الرئيسية

القانون

عدد الصفحات

81

قائمة المحتويات

• APA
• MLA
• AMA

لغة النص

العربية

نوع البيانات

رسائل جامعية

رقم السجل

BIM-1337629