تعدد الصيغ الصرفية للدلالة على المعنى الواحد و آثاره و أسبابه : الفاعلية و المفعولية أنموذجا

الملخص EN

This research addresses Plurality of morphological forms to denote a single meaning: its effects andcauses.

It also illustrates the strong connection between language levels and language internal factors.

Furthermore, this research explains the expansion of utilising morphological forms by Arabs that indicate multiple meanings beyond their primary meanings.

The importance of this paper can be seen through the provided answers for several central questions such as: Does the multiplicity of the forms could lead to different meanings? Does the context play any role in determining the connotations of these multiple forms? Or do the forms consist of several facets that are valid for every meaning? And does the multiplicity of forms used in nominative and accusative cases could result in morphological ambiguity that may affect the meaning? Generally, this paper has three sections.

The first section concentrates on the multiplicity of morphological forms that denote nominative meaning while the following section focuses on the accusative meaning.

In the third section, the researcher discusses the reasons behind the multiplicity of morphological forms that indicate a single meaning.

In the conclusion section, the author outlines the findings of the research as the following: 1.

A morphological form could go beyond its primary morphological meaning to perform different morphological functions and connotations in other language structures .

2.

Language structure, with its related contextual and situational clues, represents the main factor in determining the morphological meaning of multiple forms; morphological clues control the morphological functions of forms .

3.

Morphological meanings frequently do not depend on a specific shape or formation, rather they are valid for semantic multiplicity; the flexibility of Arabic language creates this multiplicity where a single form can have multiple meanings