البلاغة التراثية و اللسانيات التداولية : نحو مقاربة تأصيلية معرفية

الملخص EN

The ancient Arabic rhetorical knowledge is considered one of the most important cognitive fields in cultural heritage.

While discourse analysis studies language as a communication tool to achieve understandability, pragmatics studies language in context of discourse.

Therefore, it was defined as a science concerned with the study of language in use.

That is, it does not study the language for itself and for its own sake, but rather the linguistic use in a specific communicative context.

From this standpoint, it becomes clear that there is an agreement between the rhetorical lesson and the pragmatic lesson in the subject of the study.

That is to say, if the rhetoric lesson takes from the science of rhetoric, meanings, and ingenuity procedural mechanisms to approach language in the context of discourse, then pragmatics takes from the theory of action linguistics and communicative imperative and its implications to study language use.

It seems that studying cognitive interference is worth searching especially between rhetorical and pragmatic concepts and the procedural mechanisms separately adopted by each field of study while dealing with the language within the denominator of communication and discourse.