الخلل في الفهم الناشئ عن احتمال النسخ و أثره في اختلاف الفقهاء

الملخص EN

The research deals with the issue of the defect in the understanding arising from the possibility of Naskh copying and its effect on the different jurists, and then presents the meaning of the defect in understanding, the meaning of the possibility, and the meaning of the legal copying, then deals with the trends of the fundamentalists in the causes of the defect and its outcome, the probability of participation, the possibility of transmission, the possibility of metaphor, And the possibility of assigning, the possibility of copying, and adding to it the addition, the introduction and delay, the transforming, and the contradiction of the reference of the pronoun, the Demonstrative nouns, the stop points and the beginning points of the different tendencies of the fundamentalists in it.

The research also dealt with the inconsistency of copying with some of the causes of the defect, such as subscription and assignment, and it appeared that subscription and assignment take precedence over copying in case one of them contradicts with it.

The first of which is the apparent conflict with ignorance of history, which is the main reason.

And the second: the presumption of the texts, and that they are subject to objection.

And third: the presence of an illusion presumption of contradiction.

And Fourth: The difference of jurists in ruling and understanding.

And the fifth: the narrator’s act violating his narrator.

And Sixth: lack of definitive knowledge of history.

This necessitated the necessity of applying methods to prevent the possibility of copying, the first of which is the lack of consideration of the possibility.

The second: the application of the legal Naskh meaning of the terms a, its conditions, the controls of what falls into it and what does not fall into it, and the methods of definitive knowledge of it without disagreement.

And the third: Trying to combine as much as possible, even if with a weak sides.

Fourth: A statement that no evidence or document has proven probability of copying or its weakness, and the existence of valid evidence against it.