مستوى الرضا لدى التدريسين عن تقييم ادائهم الجامعي : الفروع العلمية في كلية الطب نموذجا

الملخص EN

The aim of the current research is to reveal the level of satisfaction with evaluating the university performance of the teachers according to qualitative variables (scientific title and gender), College of Medicine - University of Baghdad, and to achieve this, the researcher prepared a measure of satisfaction with evaluation consisting of 16 paragraphs, which are common standards for the teaching performance in the college and were formulated In the form of reportable statements followed by an alternative scale, a triple graded answer, and it has verified the apparent validity by presenting it to a group of experts and specialists, as well as one of the structural validity indicators from the internal consistency index.

For the purposes of such research, two paragraphs No.

(17) were added, asking about the level of general satisfaction with evaluating performance through two alternatives (yes - no) and paragraph (18) asking the teacher to mentionThe degree of his annual evaluation in light of the official performance evaluation form (Appendix 3), and the scale was applied to a randomly selected sample of (88) size and 53% of the target population.

Some statistical treatments were used such as the arithmetic mean, standard deviation, correlation coefficient, the T-test and the single-variance analysis, and the following results were reached: 1- The level of satisfaction according to the scale is below average 2- The level of evaluation according to the evaluation form is very good 3- There are no significant differences between the arithmetic averages of the total grades according to the scale of satisfaction in succession to the scientific title 4- There are no significant differences between the arithmetic averages of the total scores according to the measure of satisfaction, respectively, by gender 5- The percentage of those who were satisfied with his evaluation was approximately 52% (yes) and those who were dissatisfied (no) 48%.

6- And I concluded some conclusions, the most important of which are (one of the important reasons for the low level of satisfaction with performance evaluation is due to the unilateralism of the evaluation source, which is the heads of departments) and some recommendations, including (the activation of various evaluation methods such as external evaluation of fellow students And the participation of the heads of scientific departments in training courses on comprehensive performance evaluation) and some complementary or development field research was suggested.