الإضافة الوصفية إلى مرتبة ( الثقة)‎ عند المحدثين و دلالاتها في النقد الحديثي : دراسة تطبيقية

الملخص EN

This study dealt with: the importance of acquiring knowledge related to the honor Prophetic hadith and its types from hadith books and its terminology, books of men, their translations and their classes, as well as the difference between theoretical knowledge of the types of hadith, and the conditions of men, and between the critical mechanism and methodology that the diligent must follow in order for him to attach the hadith as appropriate to him according to his study of al-Isnad and its narrators.

And in view of the need for critical practice for a critical modernist and mujtahid who documented by huis diligence; a group of genius scholars, critics, whom God Almighty made as Lighthouse of Islam and as a model in the religion and critics of the movement of antiquities.

The critical balance of hadith is a great scale, by which the justice of the narrators and the strength of their memorization and control are weighed, searched and tested, and the realization of the trustworthiness of the narrator and the issuance of the judgment about it is weighed by descriptions added to his document by modification.

So the science of al-jarh and ta'deel, which is specialized in searching the narrators, then each narrator judged according to his own degree and rank, according to the verification of the credibility of the description and its addition, in order for him to be judged by acceptance and invoked by his saying or without such rulings, such as writing, consideration or leaving.

This study came to address the delusion that occurs among students of knowledge and scholars in the field of the Noble Hadith in general, and the science of men and criticism of al-Isanid in particular.

In clarifying the rank of the narrator described as (trust) without looking at the descriptive addition that may negate the trust about him if it is attached to his description, meaning: not necessarily everyone who is described as trustworthy: the hadith is acceptable.

The study methodology included: the inductive approach in collecting the descriptive additions to the trust, which amounted to (49) descriptions and categorizing them according to the critical levels, and the adoption of the ranks of al-Jarh and modification according to Imam Ibn Abi Hatim Al-Razi; Because he has the lead in arranging and refining these ranks and clarifying their provisions, and the research is divided into: an introduction, five sections and a conclusion with the most important results.