أبعاد الإشراف العلمي على البحوث العلمية في بحوث علم الاجتماع

الملخص EN

The aim of the research was to identify the supervisor's cognitive role in the supervisory process, and to identify the nature of human relations between the supervisor and the researcher within the supervisory process.

it also aimed to identify the academic capabilities possessed by the scientific supervisor.

to achieve the objectives of the research, the two researchers relied on the quantitative and qualitative analytical descriptive method, which came in line with the objectives and questions of the research.

the two researchers relied on several research methods to achieve the objectives of the research and answer its questions, including: the method of social survey by sample, and the method of open in- depth interview.

the results of the research revealed that there is a weakness in the role of the supervisor cognitively, due to the researcher's difficulty in meeting with the supervisory meetings.

the vast majority of supervisors encourage the researcher to be independent and work alone in scientific research without guidance or instruction.

at the end of the researcher's completion of his mission, the supervisor gives him general non- essential comments on the submitted work, the qualitative results also revealed that the level of social support provided by the supervisor to the researcher was moderate, as the supervisor provided moral support to the researcher and improved his treatment, but did not seek to establish personal relationships that amount to friendship with the researcher.

as for the subjective dimension, the results of the research revealed that the supervisor’s commitment to the ethics of scientific research in his profession and with his students came in an average way, despite most supervisors’ observance of objectivity and scientific honesty in their work and urging researchers to abide by it, but they do not apply justice and equality in dealing with all students.