القيم الحجاجية للبديع مناظرة أبي سعيد السيرافي لمتى بن يونس القنائي أنموذجا

الملخص EN

Research heading: Argumentative values in Al-Badi’, the debate of Abu-Saeed Al-Serafi with Matta Bin Younus Al- Qinai as a model.

Research topic: A study of scientific formation for Al-Serafi and its impact statement in eloquences arguments by debating with Matta and searching for debate paths in the rhetorical lesson.

Moreover, standoff the combination of Al-Badi' argumentative method in terms of aesthetic function with the requirements of persuasion, counterpoint, encounter, and analogue observance are rhetorical tools that directing meanings towards persuasion and enjoyment together.

Research aim: 1.

Following the argumentative values of Al-Badi’ for Al-Serafi debate, it’s a phenomenon that requires tracking for having a good statement of meanings that desired in the most beautiful, elegant and impressive images.

2.

Linking the functional phenomenon of Al-Badi’ with the persuasions requirements, as it may be under the illusion that Al- Badi’ is far of need and persuasion from its improving function.

3.

Explaining the aesthetic secrets and semantic functions of Al-Badi’ that accompanies the evidence and supports them in manifesting the intended purpose.

Research curriculum: In the theoretical aspect, the study took into account the descriptive approach based on tracking and extrapolation of phenomena related to the title, from two aspects: First aspect is Al-Badi' argumentation and the second: Al-Serafi debate.

On the practical side, the analytical method in Al-Badi' studying and its impact on achieving persuasion by decisive evidence, and its impact on the listeners’ audience.

Research results: 1.

The argumentative values of counterparts, corresponding, and consideration of peer, have effectively contributed to the growth of mental meanings through two matters: First is achieving influence, appealing, and gaining the support of the recipient, the second: achieving persuasion, binding the argument, removing ambiguity, and this is the core and essence of rhetoric, for each method - of them - is an artistic tool and a rhetorical machine that works to generate more powerful and deeper argumentative energies More coherent, and more beautiful.

2.

In this debate, Al-Serafi paused on the accuracy of his speech, where he combined graceful, quality and creativity in texturing and forming meanings, so he formulated strict arguments, decisive proofs, and enlightening evidence according to a scientific, rational basis.

Due to the purpose of awakening Matta Bin Younus and correcting the philosophy and logic that he claimed.

In order not to release matters according to the requirements of fanaticism without a clear argument rather, it is according to the requirements of the mind from consideration, observation, contemplation, and reasoning.