مدى فاعلية قرارات الاتحاد الأوربي داخل النظم الداخلية للدول الأعضاء

الملخص EN

The mainstay of intent is to implement the decisions of the European Union radiate legal systems that are essential for the implementation of the legal rules of their system, the first in e ul (Enforcement Public) ape ue dairy! The state or its second institutions in allowing individuals to add the authority of the state, to guide the arbitrator in personal cases, as well as in order to protect legal articles and enforce the rule of law The treaties established for the Public Enforcement exam have ended, whereby the school has been granted powers to prosecute member states, as well as from the member states with similar powers, but there are those who are stubborn in the abusive approach to the application of arts (11) The first of these is to load the burden of law enforcement of the Commission in olute terms, This increases its responsibility and excessively transfers to it the status of a member state in a case against another member state, and even if this happens, according to Article 2, the taxpayer is involved in the issue, as it has to decide on the complaint and submit its report before the member state can submit A case before the court, but the commission has many other burdens that restore the role of the Attorney General (Prosecutor), and therefore the number of complaints against breaching the law has not increased significantly, as this will be at the expense of other important tasks incumbent upon the commission, such as submitting law proposals that are considered one of the most important tasks of the commission On the other hand, the personal allegations by individuals directly before the courts work according to the law, and are afraid of the defect that lies against the commission (20).