المواطنة عند فلاسفة العقد الاجتماعي : توماس هوبز، جون لوك، جون جاك روسو

الملخص EN

This scientific paper deals with the issue of the interpretation of citizenship, which has a significant impact on political thought, whether ancient or modern with philosophers of the social contract such as Thomas Hobbes, john Locke, and jean-Jacques Rousseau, the cohesion of societies between each other or between them and the representatives of the authority in them, and on this basis we will try in this study to define the meaning of citizenship and find out its reality, especially among the owners of the social contract theory, showing the most important controversial issues in their view of it, and here we aim to clarify its origins and dimensions in their philosophy, using the comparative analytical method, as we committed ourselves to analyzing the ideas of the philosophers of the social contract in the issue of citizenship, revealing the most important points of contrast between their views and working to bring them closer, and thus both Hobbes and john Locke says that it gives rights to individuals and guarantees their stability in society by compromising their rights, but the difference lies in the fact that the first – Hobbes – says to waive of all rights, while the second -Locke – proves that individuals cannot give up all their rights, while Rousseau asserts that it is an adjective given to the shareholders of the supreme power capable of enacting and implementing laws.