مؤشرات الصدق و الثبات المستخدمة في الدراسات السيكومترية لأدوات القياس النفسي

الملخص EN

The current study aims to investigate the reality of extracting validity and stability indicators in the lengthy and brief psychometric studies.

To achieve this goal, the researcher relied on the descriptive approach (survey).

Like the study sample (45) psychometric studies, and the results were as follows: 1.

As for the honesty indicators, they were arranged as follows: In the first place the validity of internal consistency was (62.

22%), and in the second place the validity of the peripheral comparison was (53.

33%), and the third place was for the converging honesty index by (51.

11%) and in the fourth place the global honesty index (44.

44%) and in the fifth place is the Referees' Validity Index (35.

55%), while the uses of the Content Authenticity Indicators Contrasted Honesty came in the last ranks with very weak uses2.

As for the stability indicators, they were ranked as follows: In the first place came the Cronbach stability index (80%), in the second place the repeat stability index came with (44.

44%), and in the third place, the retail stability index came in (35.

55), while the image indicators came in second place.

Equalization, stability and correction last in very poor uses