انتقادات فلاسفة العلم لمبدأ القابلية للتكذيب عند كارل بوبر

الملخص EN

We chose to talk about the falsifiability principle of Karl Popper in view of its importance, which is represented in the break it made with the logical positivism that adopted the principle of investigation, as well as in view of the criticism leveled at the principle of falsifiability, by the philosopher of science who were contemporary with karl Popper and who came after him.

therefore, we will first clarify Karl Popper's position on the problem of induction, as well as his concept of “falsifiability” and how to apply it as a criterion for distinguishing between scientific theories, and then we will talk the criticism made philosopher of science for falsibiality principle of Karl Popper, with particular mentioning the guiding model of Thomas Kuhn and the difficulty of discrediting the scientific program for Imre Lakatos and the multiplicity of scientific methods for Paul Feyerabend.