تعقبات عبد الرحمن بن أبي حاتم وأبيه على الإمام البخاري من خلال كتاب الجرح و التعديل

الملخص EN

The research dealt with the repercussions of the two Imams Abd al-Rahman ibn Abi Hatim and his father on Imam al-Bukhari in the book “al-Jarh wal-Ta’deel” and the aim of it was to achieve the saying in those tracks, and to reveal the truth without bias or inclination, and to stand on the methodology of scholars in dealing with the mistakes of those who preceded them, and how to respond to them explaining what is correct with them, and benefiting from this methodology to apply it to the reality of scholars in their pursuit and redress against others, and drawing attention to the importance of scientific reviews and critical tracking and their impact on building the scientific personality, and developing the critical faculty among students of science, following the inductive approach and monitoring the sites that follow in it, Abd al-Rahman and his father, Imam al-Bukhari and its enumeration, then the critical analytical method to study those traces, using the opinions of the imams and the original sources in each chapter.

in the hadith in general and the knowledge of men in particular, and that he is the undisputed imam of the hadith, and that the percentage of tracings to the translations that al-Bukhari mentioned in his history is not equal to anything, as it reached (31) thirty-one, or more than (13952) thirteen thousand nine hundred and fifty-two translations, and that most of the tracks of Abu Hatim and his son Abd al-Rahman on Imam al-Bukhari are rejected, and their origin is either not to find out about the approach of Imam al-Bukhari, as he did not disclose his method in his book, only hinting and pointing, or informing them on the first copies of the great history book before it was edited and reproduced twice by Imam al-Bukhari.

it is correct, and not all traces are agreed upon between Abd al-Rahman and his father, Abd al-Rahman may disagree with him in some of them, and that most of the mistakes that occurred in the great history were not made by Imam al-Bukhari, but occurred from those who took it from him, and not everything that Ibn Abi Hatim and his father tracked is mentioned.

in the book, explanation of al-Bukhari’s error, by Ibn Abi Hatim, and there is no book explaining the illusions of addition and differentiation by al-Khatib al-Baghdadi.