الرواة الضعفاء في تاريخ أسماء الثقات لابن شاهين: دراسة مقارنة

الملخص EN

We can summarize the most prominent results that we have reached through this research, summarizedby the following points: Imam Ibn Shaheen is considered one of the negligent in the modification, as he mentionedmany narrators who were weakened by most of the scholars.

Rather, the scholars agreed on theirweakness, and some of them mentioned the consensus on its weakness, as in the translation of: Al-Musayyab bin Sharik Abu Saeed Al-Tamimi Al-Shakri Al-Kufi.

Imam Ibn Shaheen mentions in his book The History of Asma al-Thiqat, who is mentioned witha modification, even if it is mostly weak, as in the translation: Yahya bin Al-Mutawakkil, the blind, the shoe.

- It is noticeable from Ibn Shaheen's sayings that he imitates in many documentation the sayingof Imam Yahya bin Ma'in in many of his sayings, as in the translation of: Isa bin MaymoonAl-Madani, as well as the translation of: Sogdi bin Sinan Abu Muawiyah Al-Basri, and other translations.

- It is noticeable on Imam Ibn Shaheen in his biographies that the author of the translation is notfully defined, but rather refers to him as an indication of what is ambiguous with other narrators, as in his saying: Sogdi al-Basri is nothing.

- We also conclude from this research that the saying of Imam Ibn Shaheen in documentation isnot promised if it is alone.

Rather, it is necessary to look at the statements of the previous scholarsin this art, so it is considered as their saying.

- It is noted on his statements in terms of wounding and modifying that they are not explainedby merely transferring the words of the previous ones, without explaining the cause of the injury.

Finally, we ask God to accept this work, and to make it purely for His sake, Amen.