تعقبات الحافظ ابن حجر على الأئمة النقاد لاتهامهم الراوي الصدوق و من فوقه بالكذب : دراسة نقدية من خلال التقريب

الملخص EN

The subject of the research: the accepted narrators who accused the scholars of Al-Jarh and Al-Ta’deel of lying.

Al-Hafiz Ibn Hajar alerted them to the delusion of these imams, and answered that.

One of the objectives of the research: to find out the reason for this strictness, and to clarify the reality of the narrator›s condition in terms of justice and wounding..

The research method was deductive analytical Among the most important results: that one of the reasons for accusing the narrator of lying is the difference of faith, sometimes because of the harshness of the critic, and sometimes because of the narrator’s narration about the weak.

Among the most important recommendations: taking care of the science of rectification, as well as paying attention to the encyclopedias of the wound and the amendment, especially the appendices of sayings.