قضية الترك تأصيلا و تطبيقا بين منهج النبوة و مسالك التطرف

الملخص EN

The research deals with some intellectual problems in deduction and inference, by directing the eye to one of the aspects of the closed understanding of the extremists, in adopting the absolute Turk “abstract from the evidence” as a legislative source, suitable for inferring the prohibition of pursuing something that the Messenger -may God’s prayers and peace be upon him- left to do.

This is not correct according to the postulates of the transmitted and reasonable, but it is not acceptable methodologically according to the different sects and minds, and it is rejected by all the research methods that we inherited from our early and later scholars whose heritage the nation received with acceptance, especially in jurisprudence and principles.

We do not know of any of the fundamentalists or jurists who considered (merely leaving) a legislative source, or a general or detailed evidence, or a field of knowledge from which the rulings of prohibition and prohibition are derived as well as criminalization, innovation and corruption..

Oh God, except for permissibility; Which is the origin in the rulings and in which the two parties are equal: “abandonment and action”, and the research concluded that the issue of abandonment is one of the oppressed issues in hard-line thought, and it is the matters that it has not been proven that the Messenger of God did, or ordered to leave, with its inclusion in the permissible habitual, or the delegated In devotion, as well as by extrapolating the words of the fundamentalists about abandonment, it was found that they mention the speech about abandonment as an act or not, (in terms of it being an act of the obligated, not in terms of it being evidence of the act) in the context of talking about “the prohibition or negation included in the assignment discourse and its connection to the act of the obligated one.” ", As for the prohibition, the requirement of commissioning is a matter of disagreement among scholars, and it revolves between the cessation, which is the verb (the completion), and the original non-existence, which is the non-action (the negation).

In understanding, selectivity in handling, relegation with narrow-mindedness in application, in addition to the absence of jurisprudence of reality by withdrawing the previous time to the present era, and the inability to disengage and remove suspicion between the trilogy of "curricula -cognitive ceiling- time dimension", and so on.

Disputes with al-Azhar al-Sharif methodology in theorizing and application, indoctrination and communication, education and training.