أسباب معارضة الحنفية لما ما اتفق عليه الشيخان البخاري و مسلم و مسألة الركعتين قبل صلاة المغرب أنموذجا : دراسة تحليلية فقهية

الملخص EN

It is known that the Sunnah is the second source after the Qur’an for the mujtahids in deducing rulings.

The proof of hadiths is not like the proof of the Qur’an, for a few of them are proven by mutawatir, and they were not written and memorized as the Qur’an was written and memorized, but were circulated among the people as evidence that was narrated when needed.

And when the fabrication and falsehood spread, the hadith scholars began collecting and writing them down, and their methods of collecting them differed, as did their sayings in judging them with validity and weakness.

Because the matter is a matter of discretion, and no one can be blamed, as long as he is diligent and his diligence is in place.

The difference appeared in general first between the people of hadith and the people of jurisprudence due to the difference in their way and approach in dealing with hadiths, and this is natural because of their different purpose in it, Focusing on his mere narration, and some scholars neglected to engage in the invoked hadiths, focusing on analogy and opinion only, so each of the two groups deserved to be challenged, blamed, and accused of deviating from the right path.Among those who challenged it by leaving some of the authentic hadiths is Imam Abu Hanifa, and the aim of this research is to clarify the truth of this through a subsidiary practical issue based on hadiths agreed upon by Al-Bukhari and Muslim, which is the issue of the two rak’ahs before the Maghrib prayer, mentioning the Hanafi sayings and their position on it, showing their evidence and the reasons for their apparent abandonment.

their sayings.