الوصف بالتساهل في نقد الرجال في القرنين الثالث والرابع الهجريين: دراسة تاريخية

الملخص EN

Praise be to God, lord of the worlds, and prayers and peace be upon our prophet Muhammad, and upon all his family and companions.

then one of the most important presumptions of weighting between the sayings of the imams of Jarh and Tadheel, especially when there is a conflict, is that which relates to the description of the imams of Jarh and Tadheel with intransigence, moderation and leniency according to their methods and methods in criticizing the narrators.

this division stands on a difference in the opinions of scholars about it, and about the imams who were described with it, and about those rules and methods they adopted in their criticism of the narrators; among the most important of these qualities, and the most influential in the narrator’s judgment, and then judging the hadiths is the characteristic of leniency.

the principle of leniency in terms of origin contradicts the rules and regulations of the science of wounding and modification that are built on investigation and fairness; therefore, it was important to study that trait, its rules, and the imams who described it, an applied study, that combines scientific rooting, practical application, according to the approach of sounding, induction, and analytical study, so that we are closer to the practical reality than to the theoretical side.

god almighty in the study of “description of leniency in criticism of men in the two centuries: the third and fourth centuries of the Hijrah, a historical study”, provided that the study is organized in an introduction, three sections, and a conclusion.

the research included: an introduction to the definition of "leniency in criticism of men", and an introduction that includes: the importance of the research, the motivation for choosing it, the study's objectives, the research problem, and the research plan.

as for the first topic, it was devoted to dividing the imams of criticism into hardened, moderate and lenient, and to explain the meaning of strictness and moderation in criticism, and the most famous imams who were described as such.

as for the second topic, it was devoted to the description of leniency in criticizing men, in the third and fourth centuries ah.

it included three demands: the reasons for describing the leniency in criticism of men and its controls, and the imams of criticism who were described as lenient in criticizing men in these two centuries, and the beginning of the emergence and leniency in criticism of men.

as for the third topic, it was devoted to explaining the effect of the description of leniency in criticizing men, from two sides: from the point of view of rooting, and from the point of view of the applied study of the imams who were described as leniency.