فينومينولوجيا الوعي المضطرب : إشكالية اللغة و العلامة في المنظومة الهوسرلية

الملخص EN

The aim of this study is to clarify that Husserl understood the reality of language according to the notion of the epoche.

For this reason, his analysis of signs -whether indications or phrases- arose from his transcendental position.

The meanings of phrases are thus pre-generated inside consciousness, apart from the role which is played by the composition of expressions agreed upon.

Husserl did not succeed in solving this dilemma by resorting to differentiating between the noesis and the noema within consciousness because consciousness is not closed in upon itself but is open to the world.

But here, the language of the transcendental self must clash with the language of the natural position of man, and this leads to a deep contradiction between a language agreed upon by transcendental selves and a language agreed upon by an entire nation and is considered a result of a grand historical existential experience.

The sections of this essay are as follows: a) The roots of the phenomenological methodology or the return to things themselves; b) the phenomenological response in relation to language: the transformation of the language of the experiential self to the language of the transcendental self); c) the concept of the sign between the noesis and the noema: the sign at the level of rationalization and the rational; and d) the conclusion.