قصة نوح عليه السلام مع قومه في كتب التفسير بين الأصيل و الدخيل : دراسة مقارنة

الملخص EN

This research talked about the story of Noah in books of interpretation between the original and the intruder, and what came in the folds of some of these books of exotic narratives and sayings.

Of the details about Noah’s ark, whether its length, width or height, or talking about its layers and determining the location of its mooring and its circumnavigation around the house is a rubble of the intruder that has no basis because it is not mentioned in the Qur’an or Sunnah, and that most of the commentators have relied on their details on what was reported by Israeli women through The People of the Book and Ibn Noah is his son because he was crucified and he is an unbeliever, and that the Qur’an did not specify the number of those who believed with Noah.

The most correct view is that the enlightenment is the enlightenment of bread.

In parts and details, if there was any benefit in it, the Holy Qur’an would mention it because knowledge about it does not work, and ignorance about it does not harm and adopting an authentic interpretation that is based on what is true from the maxim and what is praiseworthy from the opinion.

The two researchers note that this research is derived from a doctoral thesis entitled: “The Story of Adam and Ulu Al-Azm from the Messengers in Books of Interpretation between Al-Aseel and Al-Dakhil, a Comparative Objective Study”, which the researcher intends to discuss soon, God willing.