علاقة الاختصاص القضائي بالنظام العام

الملخص EN

The study dealt with the relationship of jurisdiction with public order.

The problem of the study was that the multiplicity and diversity of cases became necessary to distribute jurisdictions based on certain criteria and foundations, which led to the division of jurisdiction into (qualitative, value, local and international) for the courts, which raises the question about the extent to which the rules of jurisdiction are related to the public order.

The importance of the study stems from the need to provide a study on international jurisdiction and its relationship to the public system to benefit from it before the legislature, judges and researchers.

The importance of studying the rules of jurisdiction and public order in the Sudanese Civil Procedure Code of 1983 AD, and comparative laws to know the advantages and address the negatives in the national law.

The importance of defining the rules of jurisdiction related to the public order, which leads to the speedy settlement of cases and the lack of lengthening the litigation procedures.

The study aimed to identify the extent to which the rules of jurisdiction relate to the public order.

The study followed the descriptive analytical method and the comparative method.

The study reached the text of the Sudanese legislator on the rules of jurisdiction and made the regulation of relations that include the foreign element the basic principle for the implementation of sovereignty.

The defense of lack of specific jurisdiction in Sudanese law is one of the formal defenses related to public order, that the rules of specific jurisdiction in Sudanese law are related to public order.

The rules of value jurisdiction are part of the public order, and the Sudanese legislator made them controls on which the jurisdiction of the courts is based.